South African English Press
CAPE TIMES
Wednesday, June 8, 1966Tactical Error
WE hope our
Department of Information, or whoever is responsible for governmental
public relations, has learnt a tactical lesson from the Kennedy visit.
It was quite obvious and perhaps understandable that the volatile senator's
descent on South Africa was about as welcome as a lady of easy virtue
at a christening. If there were really powerful reasons for fearing what
Mr. Kennedy might say or do there might possibly have been a case for
keeping him out of the country altogether. But if courage or conviction
were lacking for such drastic action, surely the alternative should have
been to make the visit as normal and as unobtrusive as possible? Instead
our Government fell noisily between the two stools. It incurred as much
opprobrium as would have been incurred if the senator had been refused
a visa; and did nothing to reduce the publicity and mischief-making potentialities
of the occasion.
The Government, in fact, did worse than nothing. By officially boycotting
the visit, the Minister or Ministers responsible positively helped to
inflate the occasion, to concentrate the maximum attention on it inside
and outside South Africa, to ensure its maximum success as a "publicity
stunt". No firm of public relations consultants could have done anything
remotely as effective. The official reasons given are not calculated to
enhance our country's intellectual image. The bit about a "private
visit" is absurd when the private visitor is a United States senator,
a former Attorney General, a very probable contender for the presidency
of the United States, the bearer of a famous name and, in his own right,
a politician of world stature. And prim talk about dislike of publicity
stunts is foolish while taking precisely the action to ensure the success
of the stunt.
The time chosen to invoke tyrannical executive powers to ban the visitor's
host could not have been less happy. And, typically, it did not prevent
the senator from seeing his nominal host (in the presence of flocks of
newspapermen and under the glare of the TV cameras). All it did was to
add a touch of drama and ensure that the subsequent reports and pictures
carried an implicit comment which is about as unfavourable to this country
as anything could be. Plus, of course, making absolutely certain that
the occasion would be given maximum prominence in the newspapers and on
the television screens of every country north and south of the equator.
Mr. Kennedy simply wants to advance his presidential prospects by creating a stir. Strangely enough the South African Government is helping him to do just that by denying overseas reporters facilities to cover his tour. As a result of this action people will conclude that Dr. Verwoerd is afraid of publicity. And so more attention than ever will be concentrated on Senator Kennedy's activities. How sad that Mr. Kennedy's unnecessary journey should be blown up to outsize proportions by South Africa's short-sighted restriction.